"Additionally the UDLP and the LEM white list both needing to contain device information in order for the device to NOT be detached seems redundant as I thought they were two separate options for achieving the same result but perhaps this is what you are referring to as far as the 'issue' you mentioned. My real concern is what is going to happen when i start filling in the white-list on the LEM while keeping the UDLP list working and from your previous post about the different scenarios if both have it - it works. Once I get it updated i can eventually only use the LEM's white-list and stop importing."
In a way, they are redundant, but they have different uses. If your end goal is simply to block unauthorized devices then it is redundant. The main use case for using UDLP is for disconnected nodes (such as laptops) so that when a node isn't communicating with the LEM the USB devices can still be blocked. If you don't need that, then you probably don't need UDLP.
Once you add devices to the LEM white list then the devices will be allowed. If you don't want to maintain both lists and aren't worried about devices being attached if the endpoint isn't communicating with the LEM then you can likely get rid of UDLP.